Join our WhatsApp — reps & firms. Fully accredited only · proof required before you join

PSRAS Critical Incidents Test (CIT) — Complete Guide

Prepare for the final PSRAS practical assessment: verified format, marking criteria, study syllabus mapped to SRA standards, and how to answer audio role-play scenarios.

Last updated: 5 June 2026 · Author: Robert Cashman, Duty Solicitor & Higher Court Advocate

Not the same as PSQ CIT

This guide covers the PSRAS Critical Incidents Test for police station representative accreditation. Solicitors taking the Police Station Qualification (PSQ) sit a separate CIT under different regulations — do not confuse booking or PIN requirements.

What is the CIT?

The Critical Incidents Test is the final practical assessment in PSRAS accreditation — a role-play under exam conditions testing whether you can effectively advise and assist clients at the police station (Datalaw; SRA scheme overview). Assessors mark against the SRA Standards of competence. There is no exemption from the CIT (PSRA 2025).

Prerequisites

  • Pass the written examination (or hold an LAA exemption)
  • Pass Part A of the portfolio and receive a probationary LAA PIN via ADMIN 2 (PSRA 2025)
  • Hold a valid probationary PIN when sitting PSRAS CIT (Datalaw — unlike some PSQ candidates)
  • Part B portfolio and CIT may be undertaken in either order once probationary (Datalaw)

Assessment format

Datalaw's published format uses audio scenarios — not necessarily live actors in a consultation room. You listen and respond aloud; responses are recorded. Cardiff may use a different delivery — confirm in your handbook before assuming live role-play.

Delivery

Role-play under exam conditions — Datalaw presents scenarios on audio; you respond aloud and are recorded

Structure

Chronological police station attendance: telephone → custody → disclosure → consultation → interview → post-interview

Pass standard

At least 50% on Content, Confidence, and Control in each scenario (Datalaw regulations)

Marking scheme

Datalaw regulations: pass requires at least 50% on each of Content, Confidence, and Control in each scenario.

Content

Legal, procedural, and factual accuracy — correct analysis of facts and application of law to those facts.

Behaviours: Cite PACE Code provisions; identify vulnerability; explain s.34 where silence is advised; challenge unlawful procedure.

Confidence

Self-assurance in responding — clear, decisive advice without undue hesitation.

Behaviours: Speak as the representative advising a real client; avoid reading out statute without application.

Control

Appropriate control in the scenario — managing police, client, and process.

Behaviours: Insist on disclosure before interview; request appropriate adult; intervene on oppressive questioning; stay in role.

Scenario flow (chronological)

Scenarios follow a normal police station attendance from start to finish (Datalaw):

  1. Initial telephone contact: DSCC call, client, or third party — take instructions; confirm station and status
  2. Attendance at station: Custody sergeant; custody record; volunteer vs detained; initial welfare checks
  3. Disclosure: Obtain sufficient disclosure from officer in the case; chase missing material
  4. Consultation: Private advice on caution, options, s.34, samples, identification, interview strategy
  5. PACE interview: Interventions on improper questions; breaks; prepared statement or no comment
  6. Post-interview: Bail, RUI, charge, representations; further client queries

Study syllabus (SRA-aligned modules)

Role and ethics

Authority to act; third-party instructions (Code C Annex B); conflicts; professional conduct (SRA Standards outcome 1). Code C Note 6D sets the solicitor/rep role at custody.

Source: PACE Code C; SRA Standards of competence outcome 1

Read on PoliceStationRepUK →

Vulnerable suspects and appropriate adults

Juveniles and mentally vulnerable adults require an appropriate adult before interview. Spot subtle welfare flags in scenarios and halt interview until AA present.

Source: PACE Code C paras 1.4, 3.9–3.22, 11.15

Read on PoliceStationRepUK →

Detention, reviews, and time limits

Initial detention, superintendent extension, magistrates' warrant for indictable-only; custody sergeant reviews at 6h then 9h intervals. Know when to challenge unlawful detention.

Source: PACE 1984 ss.40–44; Code C

Read on PoliceStationRepUK →

Disclosure and pre-interview advice

Code C para 11.1A — sufficient disclosure to advise. Fairness duty (*R v DPP, ex parte Lee* [1999] 2 Cr App R 304 — see CPS disclosure guidance). Chase missing material before advising interview strategy.

Source: PACE Code C; CPS Disclosure Manual

Read on PoliceStationRepUK →

Silence, prepared statements, and s.34

CJPOA 1994 s.34 — court may draw adverse inference if suspect fails to mention facts later relied on at trial when questioned under caution. Explain risks clearly; thin disclosure often supports no comment.

Source: CJPOA 1994 s.34; CPS adverse inferences guidance

Read on PoliceStationRepUK →

Identification procedures

PACE Code D — VIPER, parade, group identification; street identification fairness. Know when formal procedures required and when to object.

Source: PACE Code D

Read on PoliceStationRepUK →

Samples and fingerprints

PACE ss.61–63 — non-intimate vs intimate samples; consent and authorisation. Match sample type to offence and statutory power.

Source: PACE 1984; Code D

Read on PoliceStationRepUK →

Bail and post-interview

Pre-charge bail under PCSC Act 2022 Sch. 4; RUI; charge and representations. Post-interview client queries on procedure.

Source: PCSC Act 2022 Sch. 4; Home Office pre-charge bail guidance

Read on PoliceStationRepUK →

How to answer CIT prompts

Use a consistent structure — speak as the representative, not as a student:

  1. Identify the issue in one sentence (e.g. "My client is 15 — I need an appropriate adult before interview.")
  2. State the legal basis (e.g. "Under PACE Code C paragraph 11.15…")
  3. Say what you would do (e.g. "I would ask the custody sergeant to arrange an AA and refuse interview until one is present.")
  4. Explain to the client in plain language the options and consequences (including s.34 if advising silence)
  5. Stay in role — do not break character or address the assessor directly

Do not reproduce copyrighted scenario scripts from training providers. Practice with your own hypothetical facts and the site's PACE and disclosure guides.

4–6 week prep plan

Week 1–2: PACE Code C and Code D — read actively; summarise detention, disclosure, AA, interview rules
Week 3: CJPOA ss.34–38 and CPS adverse-inference guidance; practice explaining silence to a lay client aloud
Week 4: SRA Standards outcomes 1–7; map each to a mock scenario response
Week 5: Timed audio practice — respond aloud to custody/disclosure/consultation prompts; record yourself
Week 6: Full mock run under exam conditions; review marking criteria (Content / Confidence / Control)

Exam day

  • Arrive early with ID; confirm whether assessment is in-person or controlled remote (check provider timetable).
  • You need a probationary LAA PIN before attempting PSRAS CIT (Datalaw) — not the same as PSQ CIT for solicitors.
  • Listen to each audio scenario fully before responding; secondary issues (vulnerability, ID) often carry marks.
  • Speak clearly into the recorder; mumble loses Content marks.
  • Stay in role-play throughout — breaking character scores zero on that question (Datalaw).
  • Manage time across scenarios; incomplete responses fail even if earlier answers were strong.

Exam tips

  • Read each scenario twice before advising — vulnerability and identification issues are often embedded mid-flow.
  • Structure consultation advice: disclosure → law → options → instructions.
  • Cite PACE Code paragraphs where relevant; assessors expect practical decisions, not essays.
  • In interview segments, intervene clearly on oppressive or misleading questions.
  • Marks weight information gathering from police and client plus advice given (Datalaw).
  • Complete a varied portfolio before the CIT — weak case experience shows in scenario performance.

Common pitfalls

  • Missing a vulnerability or appropriate-adult issue hidden in the scenario facts
  • Advising answer questions when disclosure is inadequate without explaining CJPOA s.34 risk
  • Ignoring identification fairness under Code D
  • Breaking role-play or failing to engage with the audio scenario (zero marks — Datalaw)
  • Theoretical answers without stating what you would actually do at the station
  • Confusing PSRAS CIT with PSQ CIT (solicitor/barrister/CILEX route — different booking rules)

After the CIT

  • Assessment organisation notifies pass/fail; resit rules are in provider regulations — check current resit fees on the timetable.
  • Once CIT and Part B portfolio are both passed, you are fully accredited under PSRAS.
  • Supervising solicitor notifies DSCC; upgrade from probationary to accredited representative on the Register.
  • Permanent PSRAS PIN used for DSCC identification; firm claims fees via SaBC (INVC).

FAQs

Is the PSRAS CIT the same as the PSQ CIT?+

No. PSQ CIT is for solicitors, barristers, and CILEX members on the duty solicitor qualification route. PSRAS CIT is for police station representative accreditation. Format is similar (role-play) but booking, PIN requirements, and regulations differ.

Do I need a PIN to sit the CIT?+

Yes for PSRAS — Datalaw requires an LAA probationary PIN (issued after Part A and written exam/exemption pass). PSQ candidates without a PIN follow separate rules.

How is the CIT marked?+

Datalaw assesses Content, Confidence, and Control — you must score at least 50% on each criterion in each scenario. Cardiff uses the same SRA-regulated scheme; confirm any Cardiff-specific weighting in their handbook.

Is the CIT live actors or audio?+

Datalaw's published format uses audio scenarios with recorded verbal responses. Do not assume a live consultation room with actors unless your provider handbook says so — confirm with Cardiff if you assess there.

Can I sit the CIT before finishing Part B?+

Once probationary, Part B and CIT can be taken in either order (Datalaw). Both must pass within PSRA probationary deadlines.

What pass rate should I expect?+

Providers do not publish reliable pass-rate statistics suitable for candidates. Prepare using SRA standards, PACE Codes, and portfolio experience rather than assuming an easy pass.

Sources & further reading

Links are to official publishers (legislation, gov.uk, CPS, LAA, Sentencing Council). Case law on this site is limited to entries in our verified case-law registry. Always confirm the current version before relying on it in live advice.

Partner — exam prep

PSR Train

Preparing for PSRAS or the CIT?

Interactive practice on a partner platform — timed MCQs, learning modules, and scenario training aligned with PACE.

  • Timed MCQ practice with instant feedback
  • PACE-aligned learning modules
  • CIT-style scenario exercises

Free access whilst testing on psrtrain.com

Training guidance only — completion does not confer PSRAS accreditation.

Try PSR Train

Advertisement. Partner exam-prep platform. Disclosure

Need help?

Find an accredited police station representative or get in touch.